| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1536 - 1540 of 2448

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Speed Pack vs Arafa Marketing regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 66/2024

2025-04-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Speed Pack vs Babiyos Marketing regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 263/2024

PERUMBAVOOR

2025-04-10

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishad M.M., Najeeba Nishad, Ibrahamkutty M.M. regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 39/2019

2025-03-13

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s Global Enterprises regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 103/2019

Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District, Kerala

2025-02-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between A.M.A Oil Mill vs Reji Haneefa regarding realization of amount

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 196/2023

Perumbavoor

2025-01-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

34%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petition was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to pay the required batta for proceeding with the case.

Found in 34 cases (34%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff Representation

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation during court hearings.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or cases.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Plaintiffs were unable to provide necessary documents, leading to dismissals of their petitions.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff Representation

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?