| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1106 - 1110 of 2453

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Corporation Bank vs Jeouf Thomas et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 669/2018

Ernakulam

2024-11-25

approximately-6 years 4 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India vs Sini Varghese regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S No. 290/2022

Ernakulam

2024-11-25

approximately-2 years 6 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M J Alexander @ Alex vs Tharies regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1029/2023

Ernakulam

2024-11-27

approximately-3 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Reji Mathew vs Nazer P.A. et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 803/2024

Ernakulam

2024-11-26

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Karthik S regarding Recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1112/2023

Ernakulam

2024-11-30

approximately-3 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

221

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence for Means to Pay

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not presenting evidence showing defendants' ability to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Several cases were dismissed because plaintiffs were absent during important hearings or proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Some cases were dismissed because the plaintiffs' counsel did not actively pursue their claims in court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence for Means to Pay

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?