| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 741 - 745 of 1355

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Ramesh Valiyaveetil et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 7/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-09-26

0 years, 9 months, 21 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Bharathy Auto Finance vs Kadar regarding suit for money

Money Recovery - Adalath Settlement

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 357 OF 2017

Tirur

2018-09-14

Less than a year

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Shabeeb.V.P. vs Jafar Kalluvalappil regarding money borrowed for purchasing a vehicle

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 147 OF 2016

Tirur

2018-08-31

1 year 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between K. Drisya vs Vinod Kumar regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 7 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-08-31

4 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary Ozhur Service Co-operative Bank Limited vs Nannatt Ahammad Koya et al regarding debt recovery

Civil Suit - Debt Recovery

EP 11/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-08-30

0 years, 8 months, 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

83%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,355 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 11%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 193 cases)
Statement of Account (in 187 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 173 cases)
Loan Application (in 128 cases)
Postal receipt (in 101 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1120
Defendant Won: 173

173

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to default dismissals.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Multiple cases saw plaintiffs absent, resulting in automatic dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence on Means to Pay

Plaintiffs often failed to provide evidence showing defendants’ ability to pay the decree.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

In certain instances, plaintiffs or their counsel did not press their claims, leading to dismissals.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence on Means to Pay

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?