Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.155/2024

Case between Austin A. James vs Shibin M.R regarding recovery of money

Court
Court of Principal Munsiff
Judge
Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months 16 days
Case Code No.
155
Case Closed
Wed, 12/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Austin A. James, is suing the defendant, Shibin M.R, for the recovery of a loan amount of ₹6,00,000/- that was borrowed for business purposes. The defendant has failed to repay the amount along with interest despite multiple requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff ₹9,24,000/- along with interest. The suit was decreed due to the defendant's failure to repay the borrowed amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹9,24,000/- with 6% interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff ₹9,24,000/- along with interest. The suit was decreed due to the defendant's failure to repay the borrowed amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence that the defendant borrowed the amount and failed to repay it as agreed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence that the defendant borrowed the amount and failed to repay it as agreed.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 establishes that an amount of ₹9,24,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Twenty-Four Thousand only) is due in respect of the loan from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹9,24,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Twenty-Four Thousand only) with 6% interest from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Austin A. James
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibin M.R
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original promissory note dated 01.02.2021, Copy of the Advocate notice dated 27.01.2024, Postal receipt evidencing the dispatch of the notice, Original reply notice dated 08.02.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sudeep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Wimble Merry Thomas
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Shiny. A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹9,24,000/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹9,24,000/- (Rupees Nine Lakh Twenty-Four Thousand only) with 6% interest from the date of filing of the suit till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Cost
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document acknowledges the receipt of ₹6,00,000/- and agrees to repay the same to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice demanded repayment of ₹6,00,000/- along with interest totaling ₹9,24,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt evidences the dispatch of the advocate's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the original reply notice from the defendant, which was deemed false and fabricated.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 12/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Selvaraj. A vs Mony @ Maniyan regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won