Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No.54 OF 2017

Case between Suresh vs Secretary et al regarding water connection dispute

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-30
Duration
112 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Suresh filed a suit seeking permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants to prevent obstruction of water supply and to mandate shifting of water connection to his name.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing water supply to the plaintiff and directed defendants to shift the water connection to plaintiff's name.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided cogent and reliable evidence to support his case, and defendants opted to remain exparte.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed to restrain defendants from obstructing water availability and to mandate shifting of water connection to plaintiff's name.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Suresh (40 years) Mullappalli House, Vettom amsom, Post vettom, Pin: 676 102, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Secretary, Society Reg. No. 221/2002 (60 years) Madathil Veedu, Vettom amsom, Post Vettom, Pin 676 102, Tirur Taluk President, Society Reg. No. 221/2002 (Age not specified years) Chetteppurath veedu, Vettom amsom, Post Vettom, Pin: 676 102, Tirur Taluk Balan (47 years) Mullappalli House, Vettom amsom, Post vettom, Pin: 676 102, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining defendants from obstructing water availability
Evidence:
The suit is decreed to restrain defendants from obstructing water availability.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing defendants to shift the water connection to plaintiff's name
Evidence:
The suit is decreed to mandate shifting of water connection to plaintiff's name.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved plaintiffs' share in the property
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Consent letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented the consent for shifting water connection
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence of possession
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Copy of Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for petition filed with authorities
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to the mediation process
Reference:
A6 & A7
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documented tax payment
Reference:
A8

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Tue, 08/22/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Society

Similar Cases