| Niyamam AI

Displaying 3451 - 3455 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sarojini.K.P et al vs Vikraman et al regarding partition of property.

Final Decree Application

OS.695/2021

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-18

approximately-2 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jalaja et al vs Jayanthi et al regarding Execution application

Execution Application

OS.No. 1184/2008

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-20

approximately-16 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sudha Devi.D.R vs R.Venkitachalam et al regarding dismissal of suit

OS.No.649/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Aji regarding recovery of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1356/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-03-21

approximately-8 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Arathi N H G et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

OS. No.1044/2015

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-03-21

approximately-3 years 8 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Plaintiff failed to present adequate evidence proving the financial capacity of the respondents to pay the decree debt.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

The petition was dismissed for default primarily due to the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary processing fees or batta.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence or Non-Representation of Plaintiff

The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or their failure to represent in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Action Toward Notice Issuance

The plaintiff did not take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence or Non-Representation of Plaintiff

Lack of Action Toward Notice Issuance

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?