Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.649/2024

Case between Sudha Devi.D.R vs R.Venkitachalam et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt. Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-03-20
Duration
Case Code No.
649
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sudha Devi.D.R is the plaintiff, and R.Venkitachalam along with Meena and Jayakumar are the defendants. The case involves a suit that the plaintiff has chosen not to press, resulting in its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a memo stating that it was not being pursued.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the plaintiff's counsel filed a memo stating that it was not being pursued.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sudha Devi.D.R
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
R.Venkitachalam
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meena
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.Premjith Palazhy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishna Dev.K.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Anayara Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Sainu Shaji
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
plaintiff filed not pressed memo stating that suit is not pressed
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed not pressed memo stating that suit is not pressed. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court referred to this document as filed during the hearing.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won