| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18476 - 18480 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma regarding Restor.Ptn 1451/2018

Restoration Petition

KLML130004792018

Malappuram

2019-02-14

0 years, 7 months, 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs SubrahmanianbChakkanath et al regarding decree holder satisfaction

Execution Petition

EP 365/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sukumaran regarding EP

Execution Petition

EP 366/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Sasidharan Devaruparambil et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 367/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.K. Hamza vs K.P. Muhammed Ali regarding Offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:33/2018

Tirur

2019-02-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta fees, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to prove plaintiffs' claims or financial capacity.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary legal steps, such as issuing notices or responding to summons.

Found in 21 cases (21%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners in Court

Several petitions were dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent from court during proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Petitioners in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?