Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
KLML130004792018

Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma regarding Restor.Ptn 1451/2018

Court
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Judge
Sri. Nimmi K K
Order Date
2019-02-14
Duration
0 years, 7 months, 26 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the petitioner Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji and the respondent Pathumma regarding a restoration petition. The court found the reasons stated in the petition to be satisfactory.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed by the court on the condition of payment of costs. The costs were paid on the same day.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The reasons stated in the petition were found to be satisfactory.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-. Petition allowed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji (65 years) Perumanna amsom, Klari desom, Post-Edarikod

Defendants

Pathumma (0 years) Omachapuzha amsom, Karinkappara desom.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-
Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Malappuram
Case Filed
Fri, 06/22/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases