Case Summary
The case involves the petitioner Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji and the respondent Pathumma regarding a restoration petition. The court found the reasons stated in the petition to be satisfactory.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed by the court on the condition of payment of costs. The costs were paid on the same day.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The reasons stated in the petition were found to be satisfactory.
The reasons stated in the petition were found to be satisfactory.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The reasons stated in the petition were found to be satisfactory.
The reasons stated in the petition were found to be satisfactory.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the reasons stated in the petition is satisfactory.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-. Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathumma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-
Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000/-.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma regarding Restor.Ptn 1451/2018
Case Code Year
Case between Paruthikkunnan Moideen Haji vs Pathumma regarding Restor.Ptn 1451/2018