| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18121 - 18125 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition No. 7 of 2011

Tirur

2019-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 8 OF 2011

Tirur

2019-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 9 OF 2011

Tirur

2019-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property.

Rent Control Petition

RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 10 OF 2011

Tirur

2019-07-01

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Shakkir et al regarding Loan Closure

Execution Petition

EP 387/2018

Malappuram

2019-07-03

0 years, 6 months, 13 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay the required court fees, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's failure to appear in court during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, resulting in case rejections.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notice

Petitioners failed to take necessary steps to issue notices to defendants, causing case dismissals.

Found in 11 cases (11%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Issue Notice

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?