Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 9 OF 2011

Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-07-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, represented by P.K.Hamzakutty, seek possession of a property from the respondent, Alukkal Koya. The court found in favor of the petitioners and directed the respondent to hand over possession.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property. The petition was allowed based on the arguments presented.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Possession of the petition schedule property
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the respondent to put the petitioner in possession of the property. The petition was allowed based on the arguments presented.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found merit in the petition under the relevant sections of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found merit in the petition under the relevant sections of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.
Supporting Evidence
The court found merit in the petition under the relevant sections of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 184/19 allowed. The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property forthwith.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.K.Hamzakutty
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Malappuram District Markasutharbiyathil Islamiya
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alukkal Koya
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property forthwith.
Evidence:
IA 184/19 allowed. The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in possession of the petition schedule property forthwith.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property
Case Code Year
Case between P.K.Hamzakutty et al vs Alukkal Koya regarding possession of property

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Parayil Muhammedkutty vs Kinassery Parambil Sugathan regarding rental agreement settlement
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Partial
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs K.P. Saidalavi regarding rent control petition
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won