| Niyamam AI

Displaying 661 - 665 of 21879

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Raveendran Nair et al vs Mohanan regarding fixation of boundary, mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Original Suit

OS 100/2020

Vaikom

2025-07-31

approximately-5 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Noby Leela et al vs NIL regarding grant of succession certificate.

Succession Case

SUCC.(O.P).05/2024

Vaikom Taluk, Kottayam District, Kerala

2025-07-31

approximately-4 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jose Babu vs Anil Prakash regarding impeachment of witness credit.

Criminal Case

S.T No. 83/2020

Vaikom

2025-08-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited et al vs Vidhya et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.114/2024

Vaikom

2025-08-16

approximately-1 year 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jose Babu vs Anil Prakash regarding recall of witness

Criminal Case

C.M.P.No.248/2025

Vaikom

2025-08-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9641

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed because they did not pay the required batta for advancing their petitions.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs' incapacity to provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps such as issuing notices or submitting documents.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Numerous cases were dismissed as plaintiffs were absent during hearings without valid justification.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?