| Niyamam AI

Displaying 621 - 625 of 21877

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thomasukutty vs Joseph et al regarding partition of property.

Civil Suit

O S.176/2022

Vaikom

2025-10-31

approximately-3 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M.T.Prasad et al vs Renjith et al regarding settlement in mediation.

Civil Suit

O.S No.220/2019

Vaikom

2025-10-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The South Indian Bank et al vs Ms.Sonia Antony et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

O.S No.235/2022

Vaikom

2025-10-28

approximately-2 years 11 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rejimon Joseph vs Radhakrishnan regarding offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

ST 158/2019

Vaikom

2025-11-17

approximately-5 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vaikathappan Nidhi Limited vs Aswathy K.A et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

O.S No.170/2024

Vaikom

2025-11-24

approximately-1 year 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Insufficient evidence to demonstrate financial means of defendants led to case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

Lack of appearance by the plaintiffs in court resulted in multiple case dismissals.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs did not take steps to issue necessary notices, leading to dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Non-Representation of Plaintiffs

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?