| Niyamam AI

Displaying 296 - 300 of 21810

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.

Civil Suit

OS 626/2024

KOLLAM

2025-07-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anuja.S. @ Thanckhi vs Harilal et al regarding Partition

Civil Suit

OS. No. 687/2017

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-8 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Akash S et al vs Anandavally regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 826/2023

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-2 years 1 month

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Patric Martin et al vs Daniel Joseph et al regarding execution application

Execution Application

OS.No. 530/2001

Kollam

2025-07-10

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Dileep Kumar vs Pushpakumar regarding Partition and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 939/2016

Kollam

2025-07-21

approximately-9 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

22%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple cases were dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to pay necessary court fees known as batta.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence of the respondent's financial means to pay the decree.

Found in 23 cases (23%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence from court proceedings, impacting their ability to present their case.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Dismissing actions due to the plaintiff's failure to issue required notices to respondents or take procedural steps.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?