| Niyamam AI

Displaying 20441 - 20445 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt.Ltd vs Haneefa. M regarding offence under N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:137/2015

2017-02-18

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Puthankott Kunhankutty Haji vs Kerala state Electricity board et al regarding compensation

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 437 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-02-17

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Puthankott Kunhankutty Haji vs Kerala state Electricity board et al regarding compensation

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 438 OF 2014

Tirur Taluk

2017-02-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Iqrah Educational Trust vs Ittikaparambil Palakkal Hassan et al regarding injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 157 OF 2013

2017-02-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary vs Athyattil Abdul Shukkoor et al regarding loan satisfaction.

Execution Petition

EP 356/2015

Malappuram

2017-02-17

1 years, 4 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required court fees, leading to defaults in their petitions.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

A significant number of cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not providing sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps in a timely manner.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner

Several petitions were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court hearings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?