| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18471 - 18475 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed Rafi vs The Vikasana Kuries Limited, Theyyath Mohandas regarding 138 of N.I. Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No:192/2017

Tirur

2019-02-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Velayudhan vs Edathottil Narayanan's children regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 142 OF 2016

2019-02-13

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thennala Service Co-operative Bank vs Prajeesh et al regarding enforcement of decree

Enforcement Petition

EP 209/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 4 months, 25 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Muhammed Vettan regarding EP 348/2018

Execution Petition

KLML130009382018

Malappuram

2019-02-15

0 years, 1 months, 27 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Vinod Chakkanth et al regarding payment of amount.

Execution Petition

EP 364/2018

Malappuram

2019-02-20

0 years, 2 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees for proceeding, resulting in case dismissal.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to dismissal.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Plaintiffs failed to follow necessary legal procedures, such as issuing notices, causing the case to be dismissed.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

The case was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Procedural Steps

Absence of the Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?