| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18256 - 18260 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunhimoideen vs Salam Vakkalath et al regarding permanent injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 184 OF 2018

2019-06-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sacretary vs Sidheekh padancheri et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 26/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-06-03

0 years, 4 months, 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashokan vs Abdurahiman regarding Property Delivery

Execution Petition

EP 161/2014

Malappuram

2019-06-03

4 years, 10 months, 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chatheri Mammad vs Moideenkutty et al regarding injunction

Suit for injunction

Original Suit No. 253 OF 2016

2019-06-04

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed kutty vs Subaitha regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 42/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-06-04

0 years, 4 months, 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple petitions were dismissed due to failure to pay necessary fees for proceedings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Representation and Evidence

Cases were dismissed due to absence of petitioners and insufficient evidence to support claims.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Petitions were dismissed as necessary notices for respondents were not issued or not proven.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Insufficient Documentation Provided

Petitioners failed to produce required documents, leading to dismissals in several cases.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Representation and Evidence

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Insufficient Documentation Provided

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?