| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1816 - 1820 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sabira. M.T et al vs Sudheesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 594/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-22

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nidheesh. P et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 450/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-22

approximately-5 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s.SUN PACKERS vs M/s. AGL Foot care regarding recovery of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 571/2024

Kozhikode

2025-09-22

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Nidheesh. P et al regarding realization of money.

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 449/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-22

approximately-7 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs MR. Amal. T. T regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 11/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-22

approximately-4 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

33%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Many petitions were dismissed because plaintiffs did not pay required court fees or batta.

Found in 33 cases (33%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence

Plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence regarding their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs or representatives during hearings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Petitions were dismissed for not issuing notices to defendants as required by law.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Absence of Evidence

Lack of Representation

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?