Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 11/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs MR. Amal. T. T regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P.
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
approximately-4 years 9 months
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is seeking to recover dues from MR. Amal. T. T, who defaulted on a loan taken for a paper bag business. The bank claims an outstanding amount along with interest due to non-payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant MR. Amal. T. T is to pay the plaintiff Canara Bank an amount of Rs. 3,30,289.44 along with interest and costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,30,289.44/- with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and 6% thereafter.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant MR. Amal. T. T is to pay the plaintiff Canara Bank an amount of Rs. 3,30,289.44 along with interest and costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint claim of borrowal of the amount and the default of the payments is proved.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint claim of borrowal of the amount and the default of the payments is proved.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint claim of borrowal of the amount and the default of the payments is proved by the affidavit of PW1 and documents No.A1 to A6 documents.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is decreed as follows: (1) The defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,30,289.44/- to the plaintiff with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MR. Amal. T. T
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sanction Memorandum, Agreement cum deed of hypothecation, Acknowledge debt and security, Copy of Lawyer notice, Account statement for the period.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Lissy K.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Gamal Nazar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,30,289.44 to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.3,30,289.44/- (Rupees Three Lakhs Thirty Thousand Two Hundred And Eighty Nine And Forty Four Paise Only) to the plaintiff with an interest at the rate of 7% till the date of decree and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is also directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to get the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document supporting the loan granted to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing the terms under which the loan was granted.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledge debt and security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgement of the debt owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant regarding the debt claim.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Account statement for the period from 22-12-2020 to 01-01-2025
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the payments and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document certifying the loan account details.
Reference:
Ext.A6(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs MR. Amal. T. T regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs MR. Amal. T. T regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 12/22/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Mathew.P.J regarding recovery of money.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Maharastra vs Sheheer.P regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs M/s.Bouchon Cakes regarding realisation of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The State Bank of India vs Sugil.G.S et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Karnataka Bank Limited vs Ananya.M et al regarding realisation of money
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won