| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18081 - 18085 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Secratary vs Kunhimuhammed regarding enforcement proceedings.

Enforcement Proceedings

EP 109/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-08-19

0 years, 5 months, 6 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Kunhimuhammed regarding ex parte proceedings.

Execution Petition

EP 110/2019

Malappuram

2019-08-19

0 years, 5 months, 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Kumaran et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 439/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-08-21

0 years, 8 months, 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mohammed vs Faizal regarding complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Criminal Case

S.T. No: 20/2018

Tirur

2019-08-21

1 year 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Hafeesa Kahnikkoth et al vs Cherachamveettil Nainamkuttikkanakath Kadeejakkutty Umma et al regarding injunction

Injunction

Original Suit No. 309 OF 2016

2019-08-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay the required batta, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismals occurred when plaintiffs could not provide sufficient evidence of respondents' means to pay.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff

Cases were dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during hearings, affecting their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Plaintiffs often failed to issue required notices, which contributed to the dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of Plaintiff

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?