Case Summary
The case involves Secratary as the decree holder and Kumaran, Baburajan, and Muhammed Rasheed as judgment debtors. The petitioner was not present and was not ready to present evidence regarding the means of the respondents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed as the petitioner was not present and failed to provide evidence regarding the means of the judgment debtors.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner was not present and did not provide required evidence.
The petitioner was not present and did not provide required evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was not present and did not provide required evidence.
The petitioner was not present and did not provide required evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
ORDER Petitioner not present. Petitioner is not ready to adduce the evidence with respect to the means of respondent. EP. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Secratary
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kumaran
- Party Age
- 49
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baburajan
- Party Age
- 27
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Rasheed
- Party Age
- 25
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jiji.J.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The execution petition was dismissed.
Evidence:
EP. Dismissed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2018