| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17661 - 17665 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunnathunadu Taluk Housing Co-Operative Society No. E-307 et al vs K. C. Noby et al regarding execution of a decree.

Execution Petition

E.P. 191/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-07-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jacob Mathew et al vs Sharewelath Chitts Ltd regarding execution of a money decree.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.4145/2017

2025-07-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rajappan et al vs Lissy Mathew et al regarding a civil suit.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.234/2018

Perumbavoor

2025-07-15

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Suresh A. vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. et al regarding Civil Suit

Civil Suit

OS.53/2024

Perumbavoor, Kerala

2025-07-11

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Hi Stack Industries vs Le Phoenix and Intechs Associates regarding suit rejection.

Civil Suit

O. S. No.356/2019

2025-07-14

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary batta fees, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to present adequate evidence regarding respondents' financial means to pay debts.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

No Steps Taken to Issue Notice

Plaintiffs did not take necessary actions to issue notices to respondents, leading to dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Multiple cases were dismissed due to the absence of petitioners in court during proceedings.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

No Steps Taken to Issue Notice

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?