Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O. S. No.356/2019

Case between Hi Stack Industries vs Le Phoenix and Intechs Associates regarding suit rejection.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 07/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Hi Stack Industries, represented by its partners, filed a suit against Le Phoenix and Intechs Associates. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing and the court rejected the suit due to lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiff was rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court to represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court to represent their case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit rejected. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 14th day of July, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hi Stack Industries
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K A Paul
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nixon Rodrigues
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Le Phoenix and Intechs Associates
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mrs. Sajilu Anwar
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Thomas
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Balagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Murukesh Reghu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Ashok Iyyani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Meena James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Balance Court Fee not remitted. Hence, suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Hi Stack Industries vs Le Phoenix and Intechs Associates regarding suit rejection.
Case Code Year
Case between Hi Stack Industries vs Le Phoenix and Intechs Associates regarding suit rejection.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 07/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Karakkattu Finance vs Ancy Rajeev regarding suit not pressed.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Keram Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Athen Enterprises regarding settlement of claim
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. vs Silja T.D., Babith Elias regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Trialliance Global Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Travancore Credits vs C.T. Ravi et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won