| Niyamam AI

Displaying 16926 - 16930 of 22128

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between C K Kochuvarghese vs M/s Aiswarya Tourist Home et al regarding dismissal of suit for default.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 289/2022

Ernakulam District

2025-09-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Infant Jesus Church represented by Fr. Deglus Pinheiro @ Douglas vs Peer Mohammed Khan regarding E.P.

Enforcement Proceedings

O.S No. 894/2018

Ernakulam

2025-09-12

approximately-7 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shyla Joy et al vs Sabu T F regarding rent control petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 158/2024

Ernakulam

2025-09-11

approximately-2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between John Lopez et al vs Treasa Lopez regarding recalling DW1.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 70/2020

Ernakulam

2025-09-11

approximately-5 years 2 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mahesh M. vs Gely George regarding Rent Control

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 75/2024

Ernakulam

2025-10-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9760

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

31%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Cases often dismissed for failure to pay required court fees, leading to defaults in petitions.

Found in 31 cases (31%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove claims or respond effectively to defendants.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Multiple cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not taking required procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitions often dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff or petitioner's representation in court.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?