| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1311 - 1315 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Johny Joseph vs Abdul Raheem @ K. M. R. Guru et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Injunction

O.S. 191/2025

Kottayam

2025-07-17

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Pathorse vs Ambily M B et al regarding injunction against trespassing and demolition.

Injunction

OS 249/2025

Kottayam District

2025-07-17

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ajitha Kumari et al vs Nil regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

FDA No. 10/2024

Kottayam

2025-07-18

approximately-6 years 5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Allianz Finance Corporation vs Biju K R regarding Review Petition

Review Petition

OS 842/2016

Kottayam

2025-07-21

approximately-1 year 1 month

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Vinod. K.N vs C.K. Saraswathyamma regarding money due on a promissory note.

Civil Suit

OS No. 73/2025

Kottayam District

2025-07-19

approximately-1 year 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide required documentation necessary to support their claims in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff or Non-Representation

Cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence or failure to appoint representation during court proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence on Financial Means

Plaintiffs failed to present evidence demonstrating the defendants' capacity to pay the decree, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Many plaintiffs did not pay necessary court fees or 'batta,' resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Produce Necessary Documents

Absence of Plaintiff or Non-Representation

Lack of Evidence on Financial Means

Non-Payment of Required Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?