Case Summary
The petitioners, including Ajitha Kumari and others, filed a petition to partition the property as per a preliminary decree. The court approved the partition plan and allocated shares to the petitioners based on the consent statement submitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of property as per the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the preliminary decree and approved the partition of the property as per the consent of the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners demonstrated consent to the preliminary decree and the commission report was accepted by the court.
The petitioners demonstrated consent to the preliminary decree and the commission report was accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners demonstrated consent to the preliminary decree and the commission report was accepted by the court.
The petitioners demonstrated consent to the preliminary decree and the commission report was accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has filed commission application to partition the property on the basis of the preliminary decree. The petitioners filed a consent statement accepting the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
On the basis of Exhibit C1(a) plan and the consent statement final decree is passed as follows;
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ajitha Kumari
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mohandas
- Party Age
- 77
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayarajan V V
- Party Age
- 73
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Santhamma Money
- Party Age
- 75
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asha
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
23.06.2025 Power of Attorney, 01.07.2025 Consent Letter.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Georgekutty C.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partitioning the property based on preliminary decree.
Evidence:
On the basis of Exhibit C1(a) plan and the consent statement final decree is passed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was executed by Petitioner No. 2 in favor of his daughter.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Consent letter
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The petitioners filed a consent statement accepting the preliminary decree.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The Commissioner measured out the property and filed this report.
Reference:
C1
Document Type:
Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This plan is part of the commission report accepted by the court.
Reference:
C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ajitha Kumari et al vs Nil regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Ajitha Kumari et al vs Nil regarding partition of property