| Niyamam AI

Displaying 801 - 805 of 21884

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Union Bank of India vs Abdul Karim regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. 251/2023

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-5 years 4 months 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between P.C Mathew vs Mathew Mathew et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. 261/2024

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-1 year 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Joseph Chacko vs Manju Joseph et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. 276/2023

Kanjirappally Taluk

2025-10-31

approximately-2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Chandravally vs Radhamani et al regarding partition and injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. 326/2022

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-3 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sebastian Mathew vs Thomas Mathew regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Counter claim

O.S 185/2020

Kanjirappally

2025-10-31

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9640

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed due to not paying the necessary fees for case progression or notice issuance.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of evidence needed to support the plaintiffs' claims.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiffs often failed by not taking the required procedural steps in their cases, leading to dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were commonly dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to appear in court.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?