| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2196 - 2200 of 15105

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between George vs Varghese et al regarding petition for remission of commission report

Civil Suit

O.S. 208/2012

2025-07-09

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between E.No. 307, Kunnathunad Taluk, Housing Co-operative Society represented by Secretary Clency Anto, W/o.Joy vs Varghese et al regarding execution of decree for realization of debt.

Execution Petition

E.P.No.195/2022

Perumbavoor

2025-07-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Krishnan et al vs Balan regarding property transfer

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 343/2018

2025-07-11

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Nutricreams Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s. Fortune Marketing regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O. S. No.364/2024

2025-07-18

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Manju Industries et al vs Varghese et al regarding temporary injunction for operation of metal crusher unit

Civil Suit

OS No.352/2024

2025-07-16

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8137

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to attend hearings or trials, leading to defaults in their suits.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Non-Production of Evidence

Plaintiffs often could not present necessary evidence or documents to support their claims.

Found in 26 cases (26%) Medium Impact

Failure to Pay Costs

Many cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not paying required court fees or costs.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

In several instances, plaintiffs had no legal representation during court proceedings, resulting in case dismissals.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Non-Production of Evidence

Failure to Pay Costs

Lack of Representation

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?