Case Summary
George filed a petition challenging the commission report and plan submitted in an ongoing suit regarding property boundaries. The defendants, including Varghese and Sucy Varghese, contended that the application was not maintainable and a repetition of earlier grievances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The commission report and plan were properly prepared in accordance with the respective title deeds of both parties, showing no bias towards the defendant.
The commission report and plan were properly prepared in accordance with the respective title deeds of both parties, showing no bias towards the defendant.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
George (65 years)
Kollaramali House, Vengola Village, Vengola kara.
Defendants
Varghese(Late) (Age not specified years)
Kollaramali House, Vengola Village, Vengola kara.
Sucy Varghese (73 years)
Kollaramali House, Vengola Village, Vengola kara.
Vinodha Varghese Isaac (44 years)
Kollaramali House, Vengola Village, Vengola kara.
Vijay Varghese (41 years)
Kollaramali House, Vengola Village, Vengola kara.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's application for reconsideration of the Commission report was not allowed.
Evidence:
Having regard to the sequence of events, including the earlier remittal of the report and the opportunity already afforded to the plaintiff to raise objections, I find no merit in the present application.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court reviewed the report and plan submitted by the Commissioner and Surveyor to evaluate the measurement of the properties as per the title deeds.
Reference:
Ext.C1 to C1(a)