| Niyamam AI

Displaying 11086 - 11090 of 15110

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Paul John Chakola et al vs M/s. P.K Varghese and sons et al regarding Rent Control.

Rent Control

R.C.P. No. 121/2021

Ernakulam

2024-12-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between T.K Alexander Vaidian vs Larson & Turbo Limited et al regarding abatement of suit.

O.S No. 54/2021

Ernakulam

2024-11-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sharath Radhakrishnan vs Galaxy Winston Apartment Owners Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S No. 903/2023

Ernakulam, Kerala

2024-11-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parthan C P vs Shaji regarding the rejection of plaint due to absence and non-payment of court fee.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.265/2024

Ernakulam

2024-11-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Thressiamma Mathew et al vs A.C.Mohanan et al regarding dismissal for default

Civil Suit

O.S No. 156/2018

Ernakulam

2024-11-01

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

39%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,022 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 4.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 574 cases)
Sale deed (in 480 cases)
Tax receipt (in 375 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 183 cases)
Death Certificate (in 182 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 5903
Defendant Won: 8099

8139

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Absence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear for hearings, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs often did not present necessary evidence, resulting in dismissal of their claims.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Lack of Representation

Claims were dismissed due to plaintiffs not having legal counsel present at hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Non-Payment of Costs

Failure to pay necessary court costs or fees contributed to the dismissal of many cases.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Absence

Failure to Provide Evidence

Lack of Representation

Non-Payment of Costs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?