Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 903/2023

Case between Sharath Radhakrishnan vs Galaxy Winston Apartment Owners Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-11-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sharath Radhakrishnan filed a suit against Galaxy Winston Apartment Owners Association and two individuals. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent himself in court. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear despite specific directions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent himself in court. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear despite specific directions.
Key Reasoning:
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 01st day of November, 2024).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sharath Radhakrishnan
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Galaxy Winston Apartment Owners Association
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varghese Stephen
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beena Joy
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Shiju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E. M Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Balaram S. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shibu Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Wafa Mariyam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sidharth P Sasi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pooja P.O
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. C Xavier
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jishin Alexander
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.B Gautham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. D2 and D3 already dismissed. D1 represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent without representation and is absent despite specific direction to appear.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sharath Radhakrishnan vs Galaxy Winston Apartment Owners Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sharath Radhakrishnan vs Galaxy Winston Apartment Owners Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won