| Niyamam AI

Displaying 16 - 20 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Suabida et al vs Nafeesu et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Petition 376/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-11-15

0 years, 9 months, 14 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ummer Farook vs Moideen Kutty regarding restoration petition

Civil Suit - Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 1503/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-11-14

0 years, 5 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammad Ajmal Hidayathulla vs Beerankoya regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 858/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-10-26

0 years 7 months 17 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Aboobacker.C.P vs Mustafa.A.K regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 1195/2018

Tirur,Malappuram

2018-10-17

0 years, 6 months, 10 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Nafeesu vs Abdul Rasak regarding restoration petition settlement

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 1897/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2018-09-28

0 years, 0 months, 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

48.28%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Plaintiffs consistently failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (48.28%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence or lack of legal representation.

Found in 21 cases (36.21%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Documents

Plaintiffs often failed to provide necessary documentation required for their cases.

Found in 10 cases (17.24%) Medium Impact

Default in Issuance of Notices

Failure to issue proper notices to respondents led to dismissals of multiple cases.

Found in 5 cases (8.62%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Required Fees

Lack of Representation

Failure to Produce Documents

Default in Issuance of Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?