Case Summary
Muhammad Ajmal Hidayathulla filed a restoration petition against Beerankoya which was allowed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of a Petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by Muhammad Ajmal Hidayathulla.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. Hence RPIA. stands allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammad Ajmal Hidayathulla
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beerankoya
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.R. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Beerankoya
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of a Petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Evidence:
Cost paid. Hence RPIA. stands allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2018