| Niyamam AI

Displaying 21 - 25 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 828/2018

Kollam

2025-08-23

approximately-6 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1011/2023

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-2 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 535/2021

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-4 years 11 months 15 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 535/2021

Kollam

2025-08-27

approximately-4 years 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Antony et al vs Brijitte Joseph regarding Injunction

Injunction

OS. 549/2024

Kollam

2025-06-11

approximately-1 year 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

43%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Multiple cases dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence at critical hearings or trials.

Found in 43 cases (43%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs often failed to submit sufficient evidence to support their claims or ownership.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Default Due to Legal Counsel Issues

Dismissing cases where plaintiffs' attorneys lacked instructions or appeared absent.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Cases dismissed because plaintiffs or their counsel did not actively pursue the litigation.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff Absence During Hearings

Lack of Evidence Provided

Default Due to Legal Counsel Issues

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?