| Niyamam AI

Displaying 156 - 160 of 495

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1125/2024

Ernakulam

2025-03-06

approximately-3 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S No. 76/2025

Ernakulam

2025-03-20

approximately-0 years 0 days

Partial

View Full Details

Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1549/2019

Ernakulam

2025-01-28

approximately-5 years 3 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jenin Daniel vs Canara Bank regarding injunction on property possession

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 47/2025

2025-09-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

O. S. No.427/2017

2025-08-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

53%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 495 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.2 years

Settlement Likelihood 4%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 119 cases)
Tax receipt (in 114 cases)
Sale deed (in 70 cases)
Land Tax Receipt (in 45 cases)
Settlement Deed (in 40 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 262
Defendant Won: 205

205

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Multiple cases dismissed due to lack of plaintiff's presence during hearings or trials.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Lack of Representation

Plaintiffs often failed due to absence of legal representation during court proceedings.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Provide Evidence

Several cases dismissed because plaintiffs did not prove their claims with adequate evidence.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Cases dismissed when plaintiffs’ counsel did not press or pursue the case.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Lack of Representation

Failure to Provide Evidence

Not Pressed by Counsel

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?