| Niyamam AI

Displaying 821 - 825 of 1220

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Anjali Devi.K.V et al vs Premnath et al regarding Rent Control.

Rent Control

Rent Control Petition. No. 67/2023

Kozhikode

2025-12-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Abdurahiman vs Musthafa Kovilkkarantakath regarding eviction

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P 114/2022

Kozhikode

2025-06-02

approximately-2 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sarasu et al vs Snehalatha et al regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R C P No.111/2020

Kozhikode

2025-06-27

approximately-5 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Smt. Snehaprabha et al vs Sri. Poothamkandi Santhosh regarding rent control petitions

Rent Control Petition

RCP.59/2021

Kozhikode

2025-06-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Smt. Snehaprabha et al vs Sri. Poothamkandi Santhosh regarding rent control petitions

Rent Control Petition

R C P No.59/2021

Kozhikode

2025-06-30

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

82%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 1,217 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.8 years

Settlement Likelihood 7%

Common Winning Factors:

Lawyer Notice (in 267 cases)
Postal receipt (in 236 cases)
Commission Report (in 192 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 167 cases)
Reply Notice (in 131 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 999
Defendant Won: 190

193

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

37%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Plaintiff or their counsel failed to appear for hearings, resulting in dismissal due to default.

Found in 37 cases (37%) High Impact

Not Pressed by Counsel

Petition was dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel failed to press the matter during court proceedings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Failure to Prove Claims

Plaintiffs did not successfully establish their claims or required legal grounds for the case.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Lack of Documentary Evidence

Insufficient or lack of necessary documentation led to the dismissal of the petition.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Absence of Plaintiff or Counsel

Not Pressed by Counsel

Failure to Prove Claims

Lack of Documentary Evidence

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?