Case Summary
The case involves rent control petitions filed by Smt. Snehaprabha and others against Sri. Poothamkandi Santhosh. The parties settled their disputes amicably through mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed both rent control petitions in accordance with the mediation agreement, directing the respondent to vacate the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties settled their disputes amicably through a mediation agreement.
The parties settled their disputes amicably through a mediation agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties settled their disputes amicably through a mediation agreement.
The parties settled their disputes amicably through a mediation agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The parties have settled their disputes amicably. Hence, I am satisfied that both the rent control petitions are to be allowed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, rent control petitions are allowed follows: 1. The Rent Control Petition RCP.59/2021 is allowed under section 11 (4) (v) and section 11 (3) of the Kerala Building Lease and Rent Control Act. 2. The Rent Control Petition RCP.50/2022 is allowed under Section 11 (2)(b) of the Act.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Smt. Snehaprabha
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. Subith. T. P
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. Jimshith. T. P
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sri. Poothamkandi Santhosh
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vimal Sankar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. K. Krishnakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vandana Venugopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room which is the subject matter of RCP.59/2021 and RCP.50/2022 on or before 30.06.2025.
Evidence:
Respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule room which is the subject matter of RCP.59/2021 and RCP.50/2022 on or before 30.06.2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Smt. Snehaprabha et al vs Sri. Poothamkandi Santhosh regarding rent control petitions
Case Code Year
Case between Smt. Snehaprabha et al vs Sri. Poothamkandi Santhosh regarding rent control petitions
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement