| Niyamam AI

Displaying 591 - 594 of 594

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Kutty Haji regarding cheque dishonour

Cheque Dishonour Case

S.T. No:5/2014

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Rahiyanath vs Nahmarali regarding offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

Criminal Case - Offence under Section 138 of N.I. Act

S.T. No:6/2014 (Refiled from S.T.192/2013 of J.F.C.M-1, Tirur)

Tirur

2014-05-27

1 year

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mujeeb Rahman. K. K. vs Abdul Rasheed. V. regarding dishonour of cheque

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour

ST.103/2012

Tirur

2014-05-20

3 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ashraf vs Shahida regarding Cheque Dishonour

Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

ST 99/2012

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-04-25

1 year, 6 months, 21 days

Prosecution

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

37%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 594 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 3.6 years

Settlement Likelihood 10%

Common Winning Factors:

Cheque (in 220 cases)
Postal receipt (in 136 cases)
Acknowledgment card (in 87 cases)
Cheque Return Memo (in 83 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 67 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 222
Defendant Won: 342

342

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

54%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Withdrawal of Complaint

Plaintiffs frequently withdrew their complaints, leading to automatic acquittals of the defendants.

Found in 54 cases (54%) High Impact

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs failed to provide adequate evidence proving the defendant's guilt, resulting in acquittals.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Several cases saw plaintiffs failing to appear in court, leading to dismissals of their complaints.

Found in 10 cases (10%) Low Impact

Lack of Process Fees

Complaints were dismissed when plaintiffs failed to pay necessary process fees, leading to acquittals.

Found in 7 cases (7%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Withdrawal of Complaint

Insufficient Evidence Presented

Plaintiff's Absence in Court

Lack of Process Fees

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?