| Niyamam AI

Displaying 2161 - 2165 of 2442

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Vijaya Bank vs B. Sreenivasalu et al regarding money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 193 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-04-07

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sulaikha et al regarding monetary claim

Civil Suit - Monetary Claim

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 92 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-04-06

Not mentioned

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Jabbar K.P. vs Abdul Nazer et al regarding default in commissioner proceedings

Civil Petition

FDA 2310/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-04-04

1 year, 7 months, 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Alihaji vs Muhammed Ali regarding money suit

Money Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 353 OF 2015

Tirur

2017-04-03

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between P.P.Vasudevan vs T.P. Shaiju regarding money matter

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 235 OF 2014

Tirur

2018-01-20

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

20%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to pay required batta, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence from court hearings or lack of representation.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence on Financial Means

Plaintiffs often failed to provide sufficient evidence demonstrating defendants' means to pay the decree debt.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Dismissals occurred frequently when plaintiffs did not produce essential documents to support their claims.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence on Financial Means

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?