Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
FDA 2310/2015

Case between Abdul Jabbar K.P. vs Abdul Nazer et al regarding default in commissioner proceedings

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C
Order Date
2017-04-04
Duration
1 year, 7 months, 16 days
Case Code No.
2310
Case Closed
Tue, 04/04/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Abdul Jabbar K.P. filed a petition against respondents Abdul Nazer and Hamzakoya for defaulting in commissioner proceedings, resulting in the case being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not cooperate with the appointed advocate commissioner for commissioner proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed for default
Case Type
Civil Petition
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not cooperate with the appointed advocate commissioner for commissioner proceedings.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not cooperate with the appointed advocate commissioner for commissioner proceedings. Hence it is learned that party is not at all interested to proceed with the petition. Hence dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Jabbar K.P.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Nazer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hamzakoya
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.M.Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Hariharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Dismissed
Outcome: Dismissed for Default
Description:
Case dismissed for default as petitioner did not cooperate with advocate commissioner
Evidence:
The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not cooperate with the appointed advocate commissioner for commissioner proceedings. Hence it is learned that party is not at all interested to proceed with the petition. Hence dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Petition
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 08/19/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/04/2017 - 12:00
From
Sat, 04/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sun, 04/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thami et al vs Suresh Babu regarding an order to pay costs
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim vs Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji regarding unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Palliyalil Nafeesa vs Alukkal Yahutty regarding money recovery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Money Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Koprambrath Karappan vs Manoj regarding dismissal of petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Petition Defendant Won