| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1886 - 1890 of 2443

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Thirunavakarasu vs Mansoor et al regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 17 OF 2014

Tirur

2014-09-29

5 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between The Secretary-In-Charge vs Pullara Sasikumar regarding debt recovery

Debt Recovery - Financial Suit

EP 7/2014

Tirur, Malappuram

2014-09-18

0 years, 8 months, 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs P.Unnikrishnan et al regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit No. 159 OF 2014

Tirur

2014-08-21

6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Yahutty vs Muhamemd Abdul Noor regarding money realization

Civil Suit - Money Realization

Original Suit No. 168 OF 2014

Tirur

2014-08-20

Unknown

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Syndicate Bank vs Prabath K regarding loan recovery

Civil Suit - Money Recovery

Original Suit Nos. 70/2014 and 71/2014

Tirur

2014-08-13

Not mentioned

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

42%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 42 cases (42%) High Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence during hearings.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissing cases was common when plaintiffs failed to provide sufficient evidence for their claims.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Cases Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs or their counsel did not press the cases.

Found in 13 cases (13%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Plaintiff

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases Not Pressed by Plaintiffs

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?