| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1811 - 1815 of 2445

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Dharman.K.P. vs Thandalam Valappil Sakkariya regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 404 of 2013

2019-10-16

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Perumanna Klari Service Sahakarana Bank vs Velayudhan Thekinkattil regarding loan closure

Civil Suit

EP 63/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-03

0 years 3 months 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Mahesh.P. P regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 194 OF 2016

2017-02-28

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Alikutty regarding realisation of money

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 126 OF 2016

2017-02-22

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between UCO Bank vs Jameela.K et al regarding money realisation

Civil Suit - Money Realisation

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 355 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-05-24

1 year

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

217

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Many petitions were dismissed due to failure to pay necessary court fees or batta required for proceedings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Numerous cases were dismissed because the plaintiff failed to appear or was not represented during hearings.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Dismissals often occurred due to insufficient evidence showing means to satisfy debts or support claims.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Failure to Produce Required Documents

Several petitions failed due to the inability of the plaintiff to provide essential documentation required by the court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Produce Required Documents

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?