| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1601 - 1605 of 2450

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Dr. V. Ajikumar et al vs Sri. Manu Abraham regarding refund of payment for prototype development

Civil Suit

O.S No. 457/2023

Ernakulam

2025-10-03

5 years 10 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Jinesh Baby regarding loan repayment

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1190/2023

2025-10-03

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Cochin Naval Base Consumer, Co-operative Society Ltd vs Midilife Pharmaceuticals regarding money transfer reversal.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Future Marketing Company vs Krimson Agencies regarding money recovery

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1085/2024

2025-11-29

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between State Bank of India et al vs Alex T.P regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 58/2025

Ernakulam

2025-11-26

1 year 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

89%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 2,443 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.9 years

Settlement Likelihood 6%

Common Winning Factors:

Statement of Account (in 538 cases)
Loan Application (in 488 cases)
Postal receipt (in 435 cases)
Demand Promissory Note (in 354 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 290 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 2163
Defendant Won: 218

218

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default due to Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple petitions were dismissed for failure to pay necessary filing fees or batta for proceedings.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Several cases were dismissed due to the plaintiff’s absence during critical court hearings.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed to present sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims or the means to pay debts.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Press the Suit

Dismissals occurred when plaintiffs did not actively pursue their cases in court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Press the Suit

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?