Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
Original Suit No. 118 OF 2015

Case between Yogakshemam Loans Ltd. et al vs Muhammed Rasheed et al regarding loan recovery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V., B.A., LL.B.
Order Date
2016-09-24
Duration
1 year 1 month 2 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Yogakshemam Loans Ltd. sued Muhammed Rasheed et al for defaulting on a loan of Rs.55,549/-, seeking repayment at 22% interest.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the defendants to pay Rs.55,549/- with 22% interest to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Payment of Rs.55,549/- with 22% interest
Case Type
Civil Suit - Money Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case through oral evidence and documents presented, as the defendants did not appear in court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.55,549/- with interest at the rate of 22% per annum.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Yogakshemam Loans Ltd. (Age not specified years) Puthanathani, Kurumbathoor Amsom, Punnathala Desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Muhammed Rasheed (Age not specified years) Chalanpadan House, Karekkad Post, Marakkara Panchayath, Kadampuzha Beevi (Age not specified years) Chalanpadan House, Karekkad Post, Marakkara Panchayath, Kadampuzha Muhammed.C.K. (Age not specified years) Chathankulam House, Vadakkumpuram, Karekkad Post, Kadampuzha, Edayoor Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Money Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Payment of Rs.55,549/- with 22% interest
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.55,549/- with interest at the rate of 22% per annum from the date of suit till today and thereafter at the rate of 6% per annum till realization on Rs.55,549/-.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of loan agreement
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal document for loan repayment
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding repayment
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of suit transaction
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Wed, 09/23/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases