O.S. No. 209/2020

Case between Xavier et al vs Roy Abraham et al regarding suit dismissal.

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM

Judge

Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran

Order Date

2025-02-06

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Xavier, submitted that the suit should not be pressed. The defendants include Roy Abraham and others.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaintiff submitted that the suit should not be pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Key Reasoning:
Not applicable

Why Defendant Won:
Not applicable

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Xavier
Party Age: 61
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: P.P. Varghese
Party Age: 58
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Joseph T.P.
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Annakutty
Party Age: 61
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Leelamma
Party Age: 51
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Roy Abraham
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jessy Sabu
Party Age: 54
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Albin Sabu
Party Age: 27
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Akhil Sabu
Party Age: 25
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Princy Joy
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: R. Gaganan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Anupama
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Plaintiff submitted suit not pressed.

Evidence:

Submitted suit not pressed and endorsed. Hence Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification