Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 122/2022

Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Judge
Kum. Abhinimol Rajendran
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ancy, the plaintiff, is seeking partition of the property that belongs to her deceased mother Thresiamma, which she claims is shared among her siblings. The defendants are resisting the partition and have been accused of attempting to devalue the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is partially decreed, granting the plaintiff a 1/5 share of the property and ordering the partition of the plaint schedule properties into five equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition and 1/5 share in the plaint schedule properties.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is partially decreed, granting the plaintiff a 1/5 share of the property and ordering the partition of the plaint schedule properties into five equal shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree of partition as the property belongs to the legal heirs of Thresiamma.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree of partition as the property belongs to the legal heirs of Thresiamma.
Supporting Evidence
From the unchallenged evidence, it can be seen that plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of partition as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule properties are ordered to be partitioned by metes and bounds in to five equal shares.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ancy
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jose @ P.S.Joseph
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Kurian
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Elsamma Thomas
Party Age
59
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jessy Biji
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No.2179/1960 of Kaduthuruthy SRO, Death certificate of Thresiamma.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhu Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joby Das.K.D
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought partition of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed in part and a preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: The plaint schedule properties are ordered to be partitioned by metes and bounds in to five equal shares.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain defendants from cutting down valuable trees.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also seeking a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction perpetually restraining the defendant from trespassing on the share of the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No.2179/1960 proving ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Death certificate of Thresiamma establishing the legal heirship.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Advocate Joby Das.K.D. identifying the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch prepared by Advocate Commissioner attached with the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Ancy vs Jose @ P.S.Joseph et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Case Filed
Thu, 06/02/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kamala Veni et al vs Rajan et al regarding injunction and fixing the boundaries.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Santhosh vs Pushkaran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Merykutty vs James et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between George vs Mary regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Simson.P.Mathew vs N.K.Kurian et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VAIKOM
Civil Suit Defendant Won