Case Summary
The Plaintiff, Walllmaax Paints Pvt Ltd., is seeking payment from the Defendant, Venugopal, who is the proprietor of S.R. Traders. The Defendant owes a total of ₹6,41,762 for dishonoured cheques related to business transactions.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant directed to pay ₹6,41,762 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹6,41,762 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree. Costs of litigation are also granted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims were supported by unchallenged evidence.
The plaintiff's claims were supported by unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claims were supported by unchallenged evidence.
The plaintiff's claims were supported by unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹6,41,762 (Rupees Six Lakh Forty-One Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty-Two only)...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Walllmaax Paints Pvt Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Venugopal
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copies of dishonoured cheques, lawyer's notice, and postal acknowledgments.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B.Jayaprakash
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Renju John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Suja R Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thresia Anu P.J
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- John Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Decreed an amount to be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of ₹6,41,762 (Rupees Six Lakh Forty-One Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty-Two only).
Relief Type:
Interest
Outcome:
Partly Granted
Description:
Interest on the decree amount as defined.
Evidence:
With 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Certified copy of the cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the amount due from the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Certified copy of cheque Dishonor Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Certified copy of the cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the amount due from the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Certified copy of cheque Dishonor Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Certified copy of the cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the amount due from the Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Certified copy of cheque Dishonor Memo
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates that the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Certified copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of notifying the Defendant about the dishonour.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Certified copy of the postal acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of notice sent to Defendant's business address.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Certified copy of the postal acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of notice sent to Defendant's business address.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
Certified copy of the returned postal envelope
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the notice sent to the residential address was unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type:
Statement of ledger account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the business transactions between Plaintiff and Defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Walllmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Venugopal regarding Suit for money.
Case Code Year
Case between Walllmaax Paints Pvt Ltd. vs Venugopal regarding Suit for money.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act