Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 179/2024

Case between Anil Philip vs C.O. Augustine regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Anil Philip is the plaintiff, and he is suing C.O. Augustine for recovery of a debt of ₹2,10,000 due to dishonoured cheque. The court found in favour of the plaintiff based on evidence presented.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹2,10,000 with interest. The plaintiff was also granted costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant directed to pay ₹2,10,000 with 6% interest per annum from 17/03/2021 and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹2,10,000 with interest. The plaintiff was also granted costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a legally enforceable debt through evidence including the dishonoured cheque.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a legally enforceable debt through evidence including the dishonoured cheque.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has made a clear case that he had been working or had undertaken work for the defendant and that Exhibit A1 cheque had been given for the same and that Exhibit A1 cheque had been dishonored, whereby the plaintiff was denied the amount that was due to him by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹2,10,000/- (Rupees two lakhs ten thousand only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from 17/03/2021, till its realisation from the defendant or his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anil Philip
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.O. Augustine
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque bearing No. 525569, Cheque Return Memo, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Postal Receipt
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. T Mohankumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Cherian Karippaparambil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jiji Nikhil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.N Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹2,10,000/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount ₹2,10,000/- from the defendant or his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the cheque.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to an interest rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) upon the principal amount ₹2,10,000/- from 17.03.2021.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relates to the amount owed by the defendant and was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the dishonour of the cheque due to account closure.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant about the dishonoured cheque and claim for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms sending of the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter issued by Department of Posts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked subject to objection during cross-examination.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Anil Philip vs C.O. Augustine regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Anil Philip vs C.O. Augustine regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nishan Impex Co vs R.T.Meena regarding recovery of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Miras sweets vs Ahammed Fuzail regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Buhuleyan V.V vs Shaji P.S regarding loan recovery
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.N Parameswaran Pillai vs P.A Sreejith regarding Suit For Realization of Money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Saju Bhaskaran vs Ebin Simon regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won