Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 415/2017

Case between Vrinda S.S. vs Augustine et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Vrinda S.S., is seeking the registration of a property sale agreement. The defendants, Augustine and Antony, failed to register the property as agreed upon, prompting the plaintiff to approach the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to execute and register the sale deed for the property in question. If the defendants fail to comply, the plaintiff may have the documents registered through court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided unchallenged evidence and documentation that substantiated her claims regarding the agreement and the defendants' obligations.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendants are hereby directed to execute and register the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff by receiving the balance sale consideration.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vrinda S.S. (43 years years) Sreekrishna Nilayam, Manjummal P.O., Eloor Village, Paravoor Taluk.

Defendants

Augustine (55 years years) Kattil Parambil House, Nedungapra P.O., Nedungapra Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk. Antony (48 years years) Kattil Parambil House, Nedungapra P.O., Nedungapra Kara, Vengoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Specific Performance
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to execute and register the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendants are hereby directed to execute and register the sale deed in favour of the plaintiff by receiving the balance sale consideration.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the sale agreement dated 07.11.2016, pivotal to the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the lawyer notice dated 02.11.2016, supporting the plaintiff's position.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reply notice dated 06.11.2017, further substantiating the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases