Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.971/2019

Case between V.M. Basheer et al vs The Special Tahasildar (L.A) et al regarding dismissal of suit for default

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-05
Duration
Case Code No.
971
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V.M. Basheer and K.M. Shirijan are the plaintiffs, while The Special Tahasildar (L.A), Kochi Metro Rail Project Ltd., and The Secretary, Corporation of Cochin are the defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of interest in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation. The plaintiffs were found to be not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of representation. The plaintiffs were found to be not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.M. Basheer
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K.M. Shirijan
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Special Tahasildar (L.A)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kochi Metro Rail Project Ltd.
Relation
represented by Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Secretary, Corporation of Cochin
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pradeep.P.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.R.S. Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Sudheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.A. Augustine
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shohan George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won